Talk:Amanda Young

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror: Saw Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Saw task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Saw media#Saw: Rebirth|Saw: Rebirth]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Saw II

I'm a bit worried that the Saw II section is overlong, but unlike Jigsaw, her character is a bit dependent on the plot to be explained. Any suggestions, or is it the fine the way it is??--CyberGhostface 20:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a bit too long. Amanda's character is dependent on the plot to a certain extent, but the Saw II section should be trimmed. --KittyCollier 16:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any suggestions?--CyberGhostface 16:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pics

I think there's too many pics for this article... it's flooded with them. Like, do we need the ones with Lynn or Adam? Jack Of Hearts | Miss A Turn 07:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam, yes as it was a fairly important part (although if anyone has any good DVD shots of Amanda killing Adam that might be better). Lynn, I don't know. I only added that at the time because it was the only Amanda-centric Saw III photo that I could find.--CyberGhostface 17:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should it be removed then (the Lynn one)? Jack Of Hearts | Miss A Turn 02:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the Lynn one and moved the death one to the forefront of the final section.--CyberGhostface 01:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Status

I think Amanda's status should be instead listed as Unknown or Pending, because although the recent MTV article confirmed her death as well as Jigsaw's, I would take it with a grain of salt, seeing as with Saw III it was "confirmed" that Donnie Wahlberg wouldn't return for that film when in fact he did. There has even been some speculation if the filmmakers have just been trying to mislead the fans with Shawnee Smith's possible return as they did with Wahlberg last time. I think it would be best if instead of Amanda's status being listed as deceased it should be either Pending or Unknown but most likely dead. It's kind of like with Dr. Gordon, in that his fate is still unclear although it seems likely that he's dead. For that matter Jigsaw's status should be listed the same as well, since it's difficult to determine for sure until the film is released and some "confirmations" may just be the exact opposite. Even though both Amanda and Jigsaw are most likely dead, I think it would be best if for now their statuses are both listed as Unknown but most likely dead, since the confirmations may be the opposite after what was done with Wahlberg in Saw III and it would be best to wait until the film's release to know for sure if either one is dead or not.

But if Dr. Gordon was officially declared to be dead, then it would be original research to declare otherwise. If Amanda is declared to be dead in an official source, we can't make speculation. If she's alive and well in the next film then we can modify her article.--CyberGhostface 14:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jigsawcomfortingamanda.PNG

Image:Jigsawcomfortingamanda.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Shawneesmithjigsawtrap.PNG

Image:Shawneesmithjigsawtrap.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Lawrence Gordon be considered a fellow apprentice?

Since Lawrence was helping Jigsaw during the events of SAW 2 - 4, it's a major possibility that he helped out Amanda with setting up her "games" too. There's no credible evidence that the two actually interacted or even acknowledged eachothers involvement (as of yet anyways, SAW X or another prequel-sequel/sequel-prequel/whatever might address this). Just saying that there's no way that Amanda was able to set up Kerry's game (the "Angel Trap") without the help of a medical professional, and Lawrence seems to be the most likely suspect. 84.64.130.209 (talk) 14:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The almighty MikeAllen has spoken and cast his law, and what he edits go's apparently. 84.64.130.209 (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]